Information on Result #470306

There is no (111, 159, 933)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 736909 453033 785875 728332 902225 788426 755285 399892 > 2159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (111, 160, 933)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction