Information on Result #470309
There is no (117, 159, 1621)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 738614 226355 631522 651137 471677 952234 492608 673442 > 2159
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (117, 160, 1621)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |