Information on Result #470317

There is no (133, 159, 27223)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 730845 026361 681772 396493 245494 619381 166264 261128 > 2159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (133, 160, 27223)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction