Information on Result #470346
There is no (88, 160, 262)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 592368 253275 757189 358481 435830 353588 885811 016088 > 2160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 161, 262)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |