Information on Result #470355

There is no (106, 160, 626)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 506867 006739 481575 124846 544503 012350 835684 415328 > 2160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 161, 626)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction