Information on Result #470357

There is no (110, 160, 824)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 497886 964672 509177 105123 098429 817424 727617 814084 > 2160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (110, 161, 824)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction