Information on Result #470368
There is no (132, 160, 16645)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 462326 532134 523178 740728 325397 608786 685788 026624 > 2160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (132, 161, 16645)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |