Information on Result #470385
There is no (63, 161, 125)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 614682 051532 516113 062581 175243 526435 103882 135206 > 2161
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (63, 162, 125)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |