Information on Result #470385

There is no (63, 161, 125)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 614682 051532 516113 062581 175243 526435 103882 135206 > 2161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 162, 125)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction