Information on Result #470397

There is no (87, 161, 249)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 194247 242707 309590 197930 585189 523987 351407 321404 > 2161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 162, 249)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction