Information on Result #470409

There is no (111, 161, 848)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 981645 888418 204414 598183 111145 642745 074134 866060 > 2161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (111, 162, 848)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction