Information on Result #470414

There is no (121, 161, 2172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 934565 277725 286338 520780 372443 973870 851819 681586 > 2161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (121, 162, 2172)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction