Information on Result #470426

There is no (145, 161, 4304450)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 923008 636546 525839 091274 697214 107993 426074 301816 > 2161

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 162, 4304450)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction