Information on Result #470436

There is no (60, 162, 116)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 680036 483942 923831 366633 400475 715879 309623 594597 > 2162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (60, 163, 116)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction