Information on Result #470439
There is no (66, 162, 134)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 556288 211600 177857 769323 018211 236971 499682 993768 > 2162
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (66, 163, 134)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |