Information on Result #470448

There is no (84, 162, 222)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 655911 793281 744533 817694 989828 307774 808151 238320 > 2162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (84, 163, 222)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction