Information on Result #470448
There is no (84, 162, 222)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 655911 793281 744533 817694 989828 307774 808151 238320 > 2162
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (84, 163, 222)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |