Information on Result #470462

There is no (112, 162, 873)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 989132 734572 257292 765352 516590 259813 134779 825036 > 2162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (112, 163, 873)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction