Information on Result #470499
There is no (81, 163, 199)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11 988626 988566 100531 431418 161553 000284 676659 768640 > 2163
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (81, 164, 199)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |