Information on Result #470542
There is no (64, 164, 126)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24 252293 746251 273101 114240 133826 960230 954058 553454 > 2164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 165, 126)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |