Information on Result #470562

There is no (104, 164, 490)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 720924 029749 114739 504983 247435 810072 342952 881584 > 2164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 165, 490)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction