Information on Result #470562
There is no (104, 164, 490)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 720924 029749 114739 504983 247435 810072 342952 881584 > 2164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (104, 165, 490)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |