Information on Result #470573

There is no (126, 164, 3117)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 409999 817020 901304 621039 418795 900161 734644 045824 > 2164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 165, 3117)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction