Information on Result #470576

There is no (132, 164, 8258)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 393712 775828 245305 768066 886674 678008 115474 747100 > 2164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 165, 8258)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction