Information on Result #470578
There is no (136, 164, 20295)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 397748 377076 285334 734103 686803 508908 981032 309544 > 2164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (136, 165, 20295)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |