Information on Result #470593

There is no (59, 165, 113)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 59 472235 745105 242739 673197 662522 266918 026077 781568 > 2165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 166, 113)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction