Information on Result #470595
There is no (63, 165, 123)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 52 130211 003334 795132 683978 767658 885555 597847 122774 > 2165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (63, 166, 123)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |