Information on Result #470596
There is no (65, 165, 129)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55 379363 164120 379590 336034 310070 109190 177705 403104 > 2165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 166, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |