Information on Result #470607

There is no (87, 165, 236)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 47 575567 800628 888508 248599 992311 625100 466294 751258 > 2165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 166, 236)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction