Information on Result #470624

There is no (121, 165, 1607)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 901867 819489 847341 970242 974991 651011 235172 695004 > 2165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (121, 166, 1607)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction