Information on Result #470630
There is no (133, 165, 8625)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 817669 846027 915524 728347 208751 617486 537961 916151 > 2165
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (133, 166, 8625)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |