Information on Result #470632

There is no (137, 165, 21326)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 791029 463025 405187 553789 007366 766807 620063 972824 > 2165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (137, 166, 21326)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction