Information on Result #470679

There is no (126, 166, 2588)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 93 564175 415788 979309 159376 573964 248619 721900 145374 > 2166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 167, 2588)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction