Information on Result #470682

There is no (132, 166, 6219)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 93 701605 352335 346890 927368 499648 604074 560980 357552 > 2166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 167, 6219)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction