Information on Result #470688

There is no (144, 166, 171313)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 93 537109 176684 022407 108404 521631 876730 618276 605392 > 2166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (144, 167, 171313)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction