Information on Result #470710

There is no (81, 167, 192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 192 965522 211198 158714 497181 340705 946559 859730 020255 > 2167

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 168, 192)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction