Information on Result #470713
There is no (87, 167, 231)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 202 665893 558122 684444 824539 642393 632274 884971 394200 > 2167
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (87, 168, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |