Information on Result #470760

There is no (74, 168, 158)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 409 985777 771281 364576 806943 771318 653496 460983 098352 > 2168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (74, 169, 158)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction