Information on Result #470764
There is no (82, 168, 196)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 388 657169 590100 544444 101435 474035 328787 030851 408232 > 2168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (82, 169, 196)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |