Information on Result #470770
There is no (94, 168, 290)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 385 600396 509533 552162 312008 822527 226846 142917 973424 > 2168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (94, 169, 290)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |