Information on Result #470776

There is no (106, 168, 488)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 393 504968 202822 900257 011649 591584 529304 680655 149556 > 2168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 169, 488)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction