Information on Result #470776
There is no (106, 168, 488)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 393 504968 202822 900257 011649 591584 529304 680655 149556 > 2168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (106, 169, 488)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |