Information on Result #470783

There is no (120, 168, 1220)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 375 964874 596692 905280 912092 451822 223381 795838 971832 > 2168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (120, 169, 1220)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction