Information on Result #470786
There is no (126, 168, 2192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 377 209195 998491 051791 473439 581790 320406 447366 944936 > 2168
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (126, 169, 2192)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |