Information on Result #470786

There is no (126, 168, 2192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 377 209195 998491 051791 473439 581790 320406 447366 944936 > 2168

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 169, 2192)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction