Information on Result #470821

There is no (87, 169, 226)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 812 857539 831963 759071 442382 180236 508147 759060 132296 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (87, 170, 226)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction