Information on Result #470821
There is no (87, 169, 226)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 812 857539 831963 759071 442382 180236 508147 759060 132296 > 2169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (87, 170, 226)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |