Information on Result #470824

There is no (93, 169, 276)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 806 605109 860369 819453 077184 905018 486688 906063 807776 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 170, 276)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction