Information on Result #470824
There is no (93, 169, 276)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 806 605109 860369 819453 077184 905018 486688 906063 807776 > 2169
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (93, 170, 276)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |