Information on Result #470829

There is no (103, 169, 412)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 781 641926 242960 333183 729633 235191 800877 596858 873500 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (103, 170, 412)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction