Information on Result #470832

There is no (109, 169, 555)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 755 750863 615156 020807 261678 195876 985203 975277 286808 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (109, 170, 555)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction