Information on Result #470847

There is no (139, 169, 15805)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 748 986042 645740 178844 266208 527644 711108 921921 868168 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (139, 170, 15805)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction