Information on Result #470848

There is no (141, 169, 26001)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 748 587428 091319 677289 286118 179727 699183 147738 896584 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (141, 170, 26001)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction