Information on Result #470849

There is no (143, 169, 46411)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 748 345487 939496 423680 015237 285871 935963 200435 151024 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (143, 170, 46411)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction