Information on Result #470850

There is no (145, 169, 91788)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 748 320001 690430 141075 685887 858681 232000 789522 552864 > 2169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 170, 91788)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction