Information on Result #470873
There is no (84, 170, 204)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1522 993978 631681 941216 221999 993502 883490 368745 476550 > 2170
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 171, 204)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |