Information on Result #470883

There is no (104, 170, 422)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1597 589666 736308 084924 092772 114766 527727 025871 793515 > 2170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 171, 422)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction